TV Fool  

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Special Topics

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-Feb-2017, 11:42 AM   #1
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
Has anyone made a 300 ohm twin lead antenna?

Has anyone made one of these antennas for a single channel from 300 ohm twin lead? How well did it work? I want to get channel 3.
http://users.wfu.edu/matthews/misc/dipole.html
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Feb-2017, 1:29 PM   #2
rickbb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 341
They work well enough, but how will you mount it? They need to be "aimed" at the tower so it works best up on the roof and getting it on some kind of non-metal mount will be tricky.

One of these for real channel 3 will be just over 6 feet long.

You can buy a low VHF, (assuming you mean real channel 3), antenna very cheaply, BTW.

Last edited by rickbb; 10-Feb-2017 at 1:32 PM.
rickbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Feb-2017, 2:02 PM   #3
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
I have seen some people have supported them in a PVC tune and was thinking about doing that and suspending it in the attic where size wouldn't matter.

I currently have a Antennas Direct High VHF antenna and it picks up real channel 3 (~50 miles away) in the winter only. I pointed it at channel 11 (5 deg mag ~50 miles away) thinking I couldn't get 3 (260 deg mag) but after the leaves fell I could. So I am expecting to loose it again come spring. My zip code is 24503.

What VHF Low antenna do you recommend? I have been looking at the Winegard HD7000R but it's only rated for 30 miles.
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Feb-2017, 3:13 PM   #4
ADTech
Antennas Direct Tech Supp
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,942
Quote:
What VHF Low antenna do you recommend?
There aren't any VHF low antennas on the market any longer so your choices are very limited. We liquidated our remaining inventory of the V4 antenna a while back, I think these guys might still have them: https://www.affordablehdtv.com/terre...8ofsvgsqj1ian2 The V4 is a cut-to-channel 4 Yagi and is effective for channels 2, 3, & 4. Not so much on 5 and poorly on 6 and FM. If you needed 5 or 6 or FM, I think our old 3FM antenna (which we also liquidated inventory of) can still be found on Amazon.

If you do add in a low-band VHF antenna, you'll still need to score an HLSJ in order to readily combine it with the rest of your setup and they're getting very scarce. I did find a listing on ebay, do a search for "CABLETRONIX HLSJ". I've not tested that particular one, but it should work based on the manufacturer's spec sheet.

Quote:
I have a Antennas Direct High VHF antenna and it picks up real channel 3
If you have the C5, it's tuned very precisely for high-VHF channels 7-13 and does a remarkable job of rejecting low-VHF and FM frequencies (it is supposed to do that by design), probably in the order of -15 to -20 dB or so on channel 3.

If you have a suitable length of 2-conductor heavy electrical wire 12-14 ga, insulated or not) and a common matching transformer (https://www.lowes.com/pd/RCA-Outdoor...former/3724168), you can easily fabricate a simple dipole without trying to find twin-lead. Use two 4'3" sections of wire attached to a simple frame of wood or PVC with a 1-2" gap between them and attach each leg of the transformer to the inside ends of the gap with a simple sheet metal screws. Aim it broadside in the direction of WBRA, then adjust for best results.
__________________
Antennas Direct Tech Support

For support and recommendations regarding our products, please contact us directly at https://www.antennasdirect.com/customer-service.html

Sorry, I'm not a mod and cannot assist with your site registration.

Last edited by ADTech; 10-Feb-2017 at 8:47 PM.
ADTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Feb-2017, 5:13 PM   #5
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
I have a DB8E with a VHF-1 retrofit kit.

Found a 100 feet of twin lead online at Fry's, ~10$ delivered. Would the twin lead or electrical wire be better?
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Feb-2017, 5:40 PM   #6
ADTech
Antennas Direct Tech Supp
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,942
If you have a matching transformer (which you're going to need anyway) and some wire, why buy twin-lead? There won't be any difference in performance if executed properly.
__________________
Antennas Direct Tech Support

For support and recommendations regarding our products, please contact us directly at https://www.antennasdirect.com/customer-service.html

Sorry, I'm not a mod and cannot assist with your site registration.
ADTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Feb-2017, 1:01 AM   #7
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
What is the range on the Antennas Direct V4? I see two places that say 25 miles and the link ADTech sent says 55 miles.
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Feb-2017, 12:06 PM   #8
ADTech
Antennas Direct Tech Supp
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,942
It is my personal opinion that range numbers are an irrelevant but a necessary evil. At best, they're only a wild-a$$ guess. There are too many other variables that are actually more important than the antenna itself that are involved in determining if any given antenna is suitable for any given situation They're pretty much a lowest common denominator for folks for whom a mile is the only thing they can relate to.
__________________
Antennas Direct Tech Support

For support and recommendations regarding our products, please contact us directly at https://www.antennasdirect.com/customer-service.html

Sorry, I'm not a mod and cannot assist with your site registration.

Last edited by ADTech; 11-Feb-2017 at 12:11 PM.
ADTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Feb-2017, 2:52 PM   #9
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,750
I agree; mileage figures are only useful to compare different models of the same brand. What counts is how strong the signals are at your location, and putting it in the attic makes them even weaker. What good is a 55 mile antenna if you happen to have a hill five miles away that blocks the signals?
Quote:
Has anyone made a 300 ohm twin lead antenna?
Yes, the twin lead folded dipole is one of my favorite antennas.

Many years ago I was located between Richmond and Norfolk. In my attic I had a folded dipole or a 5 element single channel yagi cut for each channel. I had a 2-pole, 12 position ceramic switch with its shaft extended below so that I could select which antenna I needed. It worked very well. All the feed lines were 300 ohm twin lead, which is why I used a 2-pole rotary switch.

At my next location, I only used the Norfolk channels. I had a 4-bay UHF antenna and a folded dipole for 13 connected to the original 7777 preamp that had separate inputs for UHF and VHF. The antennas were only 5 feet AGL, but reception was satisfactory. The UHF and VHF channels were about the same strength on my report, but 13 was weaker for me because of the lower gain of the folded dipole.

At my present location I am closer to Norfolk and am able to use a GE 34792 Attic Antenna indoors at ground level. Channel 13 is again weaker because the GE antenna only has a single element folded dipole for VHF-High. The UHF section has more gain, so I can get PBS on 16 which has Create, one of my favorites.



You can suspend a twin lead folded dipole for channel 3 in your attic to see how it works.



Channel 3, 60 to 66 MHZ, center frequency 63 MHz

5540/63 = 87.9 inches length for a folded dipole antenna
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SonyDiagScrGE34792.jpg (189.4 KB, 14769 views)
File Type: jpg Folded Dipole.jpg (59.4 KB, 19401 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 11-Feb-2017 at 3:23 PM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-Feb-2017, 8:23 PM   #10
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,750
To convert the dipole antenna into a 3 element beam for more gain, add a reflector and a director:

Wire Reflector, 92.3 inches,

Wire Director, 83.5 inches,

dipole to reflector spacing is 37.49 inches

dipole to director spacing is 28.12 inches

Attached Images
File Type: jpg Channel 3 Yagi.jpg (112.8 KB, 6729 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Feb-2017, 6:04 PM   #11
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
On channel real 3 I got 4 out of 10 signal strength with the twin lead and matching transformer mounted on a piece of wood in my den, in a brick house looking out a window. I am assuming it will drop some in the attic and summer with leafs also.

Is it almost certain that something like the AD V4 will work better?

ADTech, you mentioned the V4 is a cut to channel antenna, do you trim all three components? What is the difference between the V4 and Winegard HD7000R?

Is there an advantage to a full wavelength vs 1/2 wavelength antenna?

I found a well priced VHF High and Low combiner. https://www.solidsignal.com/m/product.aspx?p=zhlsj
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Feb-2017, 11:10 PM   #12
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,750
Quote:
Is it almost certain that something like the AD V4 will work better?
Nothing is certain with an attic and trees involved. You just have to try it. It does have more gain than a folded dipole, and about the same as a 3-element wire yagi, but it might not be enough for WBRA. Do you have room for an antenna that is about 10 feet wide with a 5 foot boom?
Quote:
ADTech, you mentioned the V4 is a cut to channel antenna, do you trim all three components?
You don't trim anything. The term "cut to" means that the V4 was designed to work on channels 2-6, but the best on CH4.
Quote:
What is the difference between the V4 and Winegard HD7000R?
The V4 is designed for VHF-Low, real channels 2-6, and has more gain on that band than the 7000R. The 7000R is designed for all three TV bands, and doesn't have a lot of gain on any of them.
Quote:
Is there an advantage to a full wavelength vs 1/2 wavelength antenna?
A fullwave dipole has little more gain than a halfwave dipole, but it is twice as long. For channel 3, it would be 16 feet long instead of 8 feet. We see fullwave dipoles in UHF bowtie antennas that have fullwave dipoles for each bay. A fullwave dipole is often called a collinear pair, because it has two halfwave dipoles in line side-by-side. The bowtie antenna is derived from the collinear array.







We also see fullwave elements in UHF and VHF loop antennas. Think of it as a folded dipole that has been opened up to form a circle, rectangle, or square. The folded dipole has two halfwave wires connected at the ends.

The most interesting fullwave loop antenna is the element used in Antennas Direct UHF antennas. Think of it as a fullwave dipole that has fat ends to increase the bandwidth, the way that whiskers increase the bandwidth in the bowtie antenna. Then, imagine that the ends are bent up to meet each other and join. This creates a tapered loop. Don't make one to sell, Antennas Direct holds the patent.



Instead of a 3 element ch 3 yagi, you could make a 3 element quad antenna, with 3 fullwave loops, 1/4 wave on each side, about 45 inches. The director loop would be a little smaller and the reflector loop a little larger.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg UHF Tapered Loop2.JPG (142.3 KB, 6234 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 27-Feb-2017 at 12:54 AM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Feb-2017, 12:11 AM   #13
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,750
Quote:
I found a well priced VHF High and Low combiner.
That looks good.

I see that you have a previous thread. It would have been better to add your question to that thread instead of starting a new one, which would give us the background information, making it easier to help you.

Reception Help
http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=16134

and the report
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...dfaf2e0205f846

It was suggested that you try for WVPT PBS on channel 11 with a VHF-High antenna that has more gain than the VHF dipole kit for your DB8e. Did you try that idea?
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 27-Feb-2017 at 12:28 AM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Feb-2017, 12:37 AM   #14
VTME09
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 8
Since then I have found out they have different programming and decided to go for both. Sorry this went from a a question about the twin lead to a lot more.
VTME09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Feb-2017, 1:02 AM   #15
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,750
Quote:
Sorry this went from a a question about the twin lead to a lot more.
No problem; we got to what you wanted anyway.

Quote:
Since then I have found out they have different programming and decided to go for both.
Right

WBRA
http://www.rabbitears.info/market.ph...&callsign=wbra

WVPT (my favorite; Create with travel and This Old House)
http://www.rabbitears.info/market.ph...&callsign=wvpt

Please let us know how it works out, on this thread.
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 27-Feb-2017 at 1:11 AM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Special Topics



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 9:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC