TV Fool  

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13-Mar-2011, 1:53 PM   #1
jao988
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
sudden Loss of reception

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...59791b7722e943

I've been using the same antenna setup since the DTV transition with generally good reception for our local TV stations. Sometimes a heavy windy storm will blow the antenna off aim.

All of a sudden I'm not getting anything no matter how the antenna is aimed. I know the usual direction at this point and I'm getting signal strengths in the 0-40 range (based on the Tivo signal strength meter). Normally I get strengths in the 75-99 range.

Setup includes:

Roof mounted (ranch style house - 15' mast) UHF/VHF antenna from radio shack (looks similar to a channel master cm3016)

Antenna mounted powered pre-amp (don't remember model, but purchased online based on recommendations from these forums)

Splitter to 3 different TV's , one has about a 30' run, the others 75'-100'+ runs.

Nothing has changed in our setup when the signal dropped. I thought the wind had blown the antenna off of the correct location.

Any ideas?
jao988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Mar-2011, 3:41 PM   #2
No static at all
Senior Member
 
No static at all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 547
Sounds like the preamp is defective. The mast mounted part of the system must be bypassed to confirm this. I would suggest replacing the pre-amp with a Channel Master distribution amp if this turns out to be the case.

I'm guessing you are using the Winegard HDP-269 which is prone to failure from static build-up on improperly grounded antenna systems. (Happened to me in less than 2 weeks & read of others having issues with the same model)
No static at all is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Mar-2011, 10:13 PM   #3
John Candle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,697
Tv antennas and Tv reception

The television transmissions are strong at magnetic compass 175. . An amplifier should not be needed for 1 , 2 , or 3 tv's.
John Candle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-Mar-2011, 1:51 AM   #4
jao988
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
I bypassed the Preamp and did receive some acceptable signals, but not as many as with the Preamp working, so it does look like the preamp is bad. I don't think it is even two years old...I was using a CM7778. Do you have a suggestion for another one?

As for the other comment regarding reception and whether I need a preamp, my antenna is aimed directly through some 60' plus oak trees in the next yard and I don't really think that my antenna is as high as it should be.

The only other problem I have had is that it seems I lose good signal strength as soon as a high wind storm comes through and rotates the antenna as little as 2-5 degrees.

Is there another type of antenna that would suit my needs and still allow me to recieve the one low VHF (6) channel in my area?

Thanks for all of the advice.
jao988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-Mar-2011, 2:13 AM   #5
No static at all
Senior Member
 
No static at all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 547
I recommend the Winegard 7084. It may even be enough antenna to power all 3 TV's without additional amplification. A smaller antenna may work, but not sure how much affect the trees are having on the signal. I like going a size or 2 larger to ensure better reliability during adverse weather conditions.
No static at all is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-Mar-2011, 2:35 AM   #6
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by No static at all View Post
I recommend the Winegard 7084. It may even be enough antenna to power all 3 TV's without additional amplification. A smaller antenna may work, but not sure how much affect the trees are having on the signal. I like going a size or 2 larger to ensure better reliability during adverse weather conditions.
Agreed.

I would be curious how things perform if a new or known good coax from the antenna to a single set were installed as a test.

Something does not add up here. The signal levels shown on the TVF report should be in excess of what is needed to overload the CM7778. (Or somebody tell me I'm doing the math wrong.) That suggests that there has been a long standing problem with the antenna, matching transformer, cables or connectors. Such a problem may have been masked by the gain of an amplifier that should not be needed.

An un-amplified antenna with a few dB of forward gain should be capable of driving a passive 4-way split.

Time to critically look at each component and connection...
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 15-Mar-2011 at 12:15 AM.
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-Mar-2011, 10:45 PM   #7
John Candle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,697
Tv antennas and Tv reception

I agree with GUM and NSAL. A Known To Be Good Antenna , A Known To Be Good Matching Transformer To Connect The Antenna To The Known To Be Good Single Run Of Coax that Goes Direct To One Know To Be Good Tv. With No Type Or Kind Of Amplifier.
John Candle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 5:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC