TV Fool  

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 4-Apr-2011, 11:27 AM   #21
Dave Loudin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: King George, VA
Posts: 659
Depends on what you mean by unplug. If you simply mean unplug the power cord, then that is extremely bad advice. In most, if not all cases, the un-powered preamp passes almost NO signal, so it is worse than having no preamp at all.

Please remember that you are in a signal-poor area, and what has worked for you is not generally applicable.
Dave Loudin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4-Apr-2011, 12:23 PM   #22
No static at all
Senior Member
 
No static at all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by togapete View Post
My antenna is as high as I can safely place it. Do you think that lowering it can help?
I always thought that the idea was to get as much height on an antenna as possible.
Generally spreaking higher is better, but finding the sweet spot for the desired station(s) often requires tweaking the final height a few inches up, & many times down 6 or so inches from my experiences. I've seen this happen even with strong UHF signals less than 10 miles away.
No static at all is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4-Apr-2011, 3:05 PM   #23
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
If you decide to invest in an XG91, I would not take the 8200u down right away. Instead, I would search for a mounting location with a good view of the ESB (WCBS) while shielded from WFSB (perhaps by the structure of your house).

If that proved unsuccessful, try for the opposite, look for WFSB while shielded from the ESB WCBS signal.

In either case, I would not put a preamp or distribution amplifier on the XG91 while it's dedicated to reception of one of the real channel 33 transmissions.

Your location requires some extraordinary effort to get reliable reception of a CBS affiliate. You may find it necessary to have one antenna dedicated to reception of just one or just a few stations, plus the general use antenna.

Of course you can try using the XG91 as a replacement for the 8200u... but the 8200u is up there working well on other channels at this point and the XG91 will not provide CH-2 to 13 coverage either.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 5-Apr-2011 at 8:26 PM. Reason: Comment re. no amplifiers
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-Apr-2011, 4:00 AM   #24
togapete
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Follow up

I decided to replace my attic cable run RG-6 with RG-6 Quad that had factory
ends in the closest precut size to my need ( 25'). I am happy to report a major improvment in the quality of all the channels. Even channel 2 is a little better
but it still pixilates freezes and blanks out at random time.

I found that if I aim the antenna toward Connecticut, I am able to get a stable wcbs channel signal. This was not possible during the past 2 weeks.


My next move is to replace the antenna run RG-6 with RG-6 Quad from the preamp on the antenna to the amp /splitter area about 40' feet away.

I'll post my results.

In closing ...I'd like to thank everyone for their suggestions.

Last edited by togapete; 13-Apr-2011 at 4:05 AM.
togapete is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
lost signal, wcbs

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 6:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC