Information and Articles selected by Electron.

[Electron]

The Quantified Self , http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/...d-self-/213458 .

[Electron]

There are those here at tvfool and others that would like the VHF low band channels 2 thru 6 to go away.

And would like VHF high band channels 7 thru 13 to go away.

Look for key statements such as this one , "or by moving from a UHF channel to a VHF channel".

And other statements that will push Tv broadcasters into the VHF channels weather they like it or not.

http://www.tvtechnology.com/feature-...orkshop/213854

[GroundUrMast]

The link to the article re. Channel Sharing Workshop is appreciated. It shows you have a strong interest in the future of OTA broadcast service.

However, I have seen no evidence that any regular contributor here at TV Fool wants to see any spectrum taken from OTA service. Your persistent claims that such an attitude exists is offensive in that it falsely characterizes and misrepresents the comments and statements made by those who have explained clearly, their reasons for recommending reception solutions that account for the additional noise present on the VHF bands.

[Electron]

As a on going process I have explained every which way to wednesday to explain , You miss the point every time.

You think that I am saying that there are those here at tvfool that want spectrum to be taken away , That is not the point I am making.

Because you find , offensive , and other words and concepts to that effect time after time then I suspect that you will continue on that path.

Anyway here is more on what is happening.

What Spectrum Crisis?

http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/...-crisis/214114.

[GroundUrMast]

Originally Posted by Electron

...
You think that I am saying that there are those here at tvfool that want spectrum to be taken away , That is not the point I am making. ...

If you were attempting to make some other point, the first two sentences,

Originally Posted by Electron

There are those here at tvfool and others that would like the VHF low band channels 2 thru 6 to go away.

And would like VHF high band channels 7 thru 13 to go away. ...

, clearly and concisely set the tone of your post as one of personal attack.

I have not seen any evidence to support such statements. I don't believe any regular contributor "...would like the VHF low band channels 2 thru 6 to go away." I also believe that no regular contributor "...would like VHF high band channels 7 thru 13 to go away." I believe both accusations are false and without merit. They offend because they are unjust attacks against good people.