TV Fool

TV Fool (http://forum.tvfool.com/index.php)
-   Help With Reception (http://forum.tvfool.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Best antenna for Amsterdam, NY (http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=6980)

flaave 24-Jan-2012 8:17 PM

Best antenna for Amsterdam, NY
 
I would like to break the cable cord, and I went to TV Fool and I can get the NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX and PBS with an antenna, most are approx 23.7 miles from me, one is 31.3 and the last is 56.8. the true azimuth is mostly 154 degrees two are 109, and one is 152. all are 2edge. Hope I have provided enough information. Would appreciate any assistance, thank you!

GroundUrMast 24-Jan-2012 8:47 PM

Please review the Guidelines when asking for help. There you'll find instructions on how best to produce an accurate TV Fool Report and suggestions of additional details to provide.

It's very difficult to make an informed suggestion without seeing your TV Fool Report.

flaave 24-Jan-2012 9:01 PM

TV Signal Analysis Results
 
I hope this clarifies my settings.

flaave 24-Jan-2012 9:03 PM

TV Signal Analysis Results
 
I hope this will help to clarify any missing information.

GroundUrMast 24-Jan-2012 10:08 PM

Sorry, I still don't see a link to your TV Fool Report.

flaave 25-Jan-2012 12:50 PM

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...67d937c1b11b32

GroundUrMast 25-Jan-2012 3:29 PM

Thanks for the link to your reception report.

The PBS affiliate WMHT is the weakest signal of the major network outlets. This calls for a large antenna such as the Winegard HD8200U or a combination of two high performance antennas such as the Antennas Direct 91XG and a Winegard HD5030. The two antenna system would be my preference. (Initial aim point - 165 to 170°)

In either case an Antennas Direct CPA-19 preamp will be needed to overcome cable and splitter losses.

Tower Guy 25-Jan-2012 6:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GroundUrMast (Post 19652)
combination of two high performance antennas such as the Antennas Direct 91XG and a Winegard HD5030. The two antenna system would be my preference.

That's my preference as well. To pick up WYPX you'll want either a rotator on the 91XG or a third antenna with an A/B switch or a channel 50 Jointenna.

There may be an anomaly in the terrain data. WYPX (ION) is not necessarily LOS to your location on Florida Ave.

Electron 26-Jan-2012 12:11 PM

Tv antennas and Tv reception
 
WYPX-DT 50 ION is a VERY STRONG Signal. Even if WYPX is not LOS= Line Of Sight. WYPX signal strength is 71.5 NM (dB) and that is STRONG Signal. This , Kernal of Doubt stuff , that some helpers like to do here at tvfool is not a good practice.

Tower Guy 26-Jan-2012 6:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electron (Post 19692)
This , Kernal of Doubt stuff , that some helpers like to do here at tvfool is not a good practice.

I looked at the maps. I know the area well. I live less than 20 miles away from Amsterdam, NY. The situation with WYPX suggests an extremely directional UHF antenna. This will minimize overload from WYPX. The 91XG has the lowest side lobes and greatest front to back ratio.

No kernal of doubt exists in my post.

flaave 26-Jan-2012 7:42 PM

Flap over channel WYPX
 
I do not want people to argue about channel WYPX, I have it now on Time Warner, and I do not watch it. I am only interested in the NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, and WMHT, which is actually my favorite, I am interested in the concept of having high definition channels without all the compression the cable companies traditionally do. I do appreciate the input I have gotten about the proper antenna in this area, and I will probably be looking forward to good weather to install an antenna. In the meantime, I still have Time Warner, I don't need all the channels, and I don't need the expense!


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC