TV Fool  

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 5-Oct-2013, 11:50 PM   #1
dm6789
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
Antenna advice, Is there any chance??

Trying to cut the cable but my situation is a little challenging due to a small mountain to the south. Here's the analysis: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...46ae2ce0b35948

No problem getting the local ABC & PBS but is there any chance to pull in CBS(WBZ), NBC(WHDH) and FOX(WFXT)?

I'm looking for advice for the rooftop antenna setup to use. An attic mount would be preferred but I assume it's out of the question given the expected signal levels.

Thanks in advance.
dm6789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7-Oct-2013, 5:22 PM   #2
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
The three stations, CBS(WBZ), NBC(WHDH) and FOX(WFXT) are still in the realm of possible, but certainly not easy or guarantied.

I would try an Antennas Direct 91XG. You need to be able to mount the antenna clear of any and all obstructions, ie. no trees in the way. Be ready to experiment with height and location.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 8-Oct-2013 at 3:03 AM. Reason: sp.
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7-Oct-2013, 11:47 PM   #3
dm6789
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
Update: As an experiment, I set up the largest antenna that I could find locally, an RCA ANT3036xr. Got it set up temporarily on the roof and aimed it at 174 degrees magnetic. I really didn't think it would work but much to my surprise, it pulled in all the stations I was hoping for as well as FOX (WFXT) and the Boston PBS channels.

The ANT3036 is really huge though at about 9' long X 8' wide. I'm looking for something smaller that has at least as good UHF performance. Specs on this antenna seem to be nonexistent though. I found some info that suggests it's the same antenna as the Channel Master 3018. It sure looks the same. The 3018 has an average gain of 8.4 dB for UHF. Assuming the 3036 is indeed the same antenna suggests that I may not need such a large antenna as I thought. It seems counterintuitive though given my signal analysis.

The 91XG that was suggested appears less intrusive than the 3036 but I'm wondering if I might be able to get by with something even smaller. I'm currently considering trying a multibay bowtie type like a DB2e or something similar. Does this seem like a good idea?
dm6789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8-Oct-2013, 3:14 AM   #4
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
Let the 3036 run a few days... Through some wet and windy weather if possible. If reception remains reliable, great... If not, that confirms going smaller is not going to be a good plan.

I might suggest the DB8e if smaller is mandatory.

None of the UHF only antennas are going to do well with VHF signals, though Channel Master bills the CM-4228 as having some VHF capability. You may find yourself needing to add an Antennacraft Y5713 or even Y10713 to make WENH reliable. I would try a UHF only antenna by itself, then decide if the signals from real CH-9 & CH-11 are needed/wanted.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9-Oct-2013, 3:40 AM   #5
teleview
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Most of the receivable Digital Broadcast Tv stations/channels are Very Weak Signal Strength at your location.

I recommend stay with Big 3036 antenna.

Or can install a Winegard HD7084P or a Winegard HD7698P antenna.

The tvfool radar report and channel list shows that the report is resolved to block level.

The reception is most likely better then what the tvfool report says because your actual location is at a better reception location.

This then is a example of the reason that is important to make a accurate tvfool report so one can better know what is receivable.

Last edited by teleview; 27-Oct-2013 at 8:03 AM. Reason: Clarify information and typos.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-Oct-2013, 10:41 AM   #6
dm6789
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
I decided not to try fooling around with a small antenna. Mounted a Winegard HD9095P on the roof. This setup works well when connected to one TV for all the channels that are at 174 degrees. I plan to keep it fixed with no rotor. The toughest channel that I care about getting is WFXT-DT (31).

I'd like to connect the antenna to 2 TV's. Here's the setup: 60 feet of RG6 to the 1st TV, 2-way splitter, approx 100ft of cable to the 2nd TV. With this in place, the 2nd TV doesn't pick up WFXT and it becomes iffy on the 1st TV. I assume a preamp should be installed. Signal strength for this channel is around 50% at the 1st TV. Most of the other channels show signal strength around 90%. Is a high gain preamp, say around 29dB UHF, likely to overpower the tuner on the stronger channels? Anyhow, I'd like to get preamp recommendations from the experts here.
dm6789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-Oct-2013, 3:33 PM   #7
ADTech
Antennas Direct Tech Supp
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,942
Quote:
Is a high gain preamp, say around 29dB UHF, likely to overpower the tuner on the stronger channels?
Yes. You have two "full power" stations less than 3 miles away with unobstructed signal paths.
__________________
Antennas Direct Tech Support

For support and recommendations regarding our products, please contact us directly at https://www.antennasdirect.com/customer-service.html

Sorry, I'm not a mod and cannot assist with your site registration.
ADTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Oct-2013, 2:12 PM   #8
dm6789
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
You're right, channel 34 has a very strong signal. It shows about 95% on my TV's signal meter. I forgot about this channel because I don't plan to ever watch it.

Channel 9 is not as strong because it's VHF and my antenna is UHF. It generally shows strength at around 85%.

Is there any amount of preamp gain that is safe to use without having channel 34 overpower the tuner?
dm6789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Oct-2013, 6:00 PM   #9
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
The RCA TVPRAMP1R is tolerant of strong signals. http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=13530

I have also had success using the Channel Master CM-3410 as a preamplifier. However, it needs an enclosure for protection from weather. http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=13659
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 26-Oct-2013 at 10:16 PM. Reason: Added link to CM-3410 as a preamp
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Oct-2013, 9:15 PM   #10
dm6789
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
Thanks for the suggestion. I was looking at much more expensive models but plan to give the RCA a try. Looks like good bang for the buck.
dm6789 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 3:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC