TV Fool  

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22-Aug-2013, 9:43 PM   #1
rpca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Is this the right antenna for me?

Hello,

I am planning to cancel my cable tv and receive OTA channels. According to TV Fool report I need to get an outdoor antenna to receive most of the channels. Some members in the forum have mentioned ClearStream 4 Ultra Long Range Outdoor DTV Antenna is a good antenna. I was wondering if this antenna will help me to get good reception. If so, can I install it in attic?

TV Fool report: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...46ae9333a465fc

Thank you.

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 22-Aug-2013 at 9:46 PM. Reason: repair TVFR link
rpca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-Aug-2013, 9:59 PM   #2
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
You can certainly try mounting in the attic... That will reduce your reception, how much is dependent on the attic and roof construction.

The CS4 is an excellent UHF antenna. But you have several VHF signals to consider also.

Each of the station call sign listed on a TV Fool report is an active link to a profile for that station. Click on any of the stations transmitting from the Sutro tower and you'll see that you are very close to having a direct line of sight to those signals... Can you generate a second TV Fool report using 25' as the antenna height?

It would be great to see the TVFR for the added height before making a specific recommendation.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-Aug-2013, 10:44 PM   #3
rpca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
This is the new TV Fool report with 25' antenna height.

Report: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...46ae6b53bfc16b

Most of the channels that I am interested are in UHF frequency. If I installed CS4, does it mean I cannot get VHF channels?

Beside CS4, any other antennas I should consider?

Thanks.
rpca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-Aug-2013, 11:03 PM   #4
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
Thanks for posting the second TVFR. The signals from the northwest are significantly improved.

If reliable reception of the signals from the Sutro Tower complex are a priority, I would definitely recommend mounting outdoors. A Winegard HD7694P would have both UHF and High-VHF capability. Aimed at about 310° per a compass, you should expect reception from both major groups of signals. This assumes you actually mount outdoors at about 25' AGL, clear of major obstructions such as vegetation and buildings.

I would not expect the CS4 to reliably receive KGO or KNTV.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 22-Aug-2013 at 11:06 PM. Reason: CS4 - KGO - KNTV
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Aug-2013, 3:04 AM   #5
rpca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Thanks for your great advice.

I have one more question. Is ClearStream 2V UHF/VHF a good alternative to the Winegard? I am trying to install a "low profile" antenna so that it won't be too standout.

Thanks again.
rpca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-Aug-2013, 3:19 AM   #6
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
I favor the directional characteristics of the 7694 which make it able to receive less interfering reflected signal from the sides.

But the C2V is a good option also. It's going to have lower VHF performance than the 7694 but you have plenty of signal in the air. You won't have a lack of raw signal power.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Aug-2013, 5:07 PM   #7
rpca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
I installed the C2V on the roof as you had suggested and was able to receive majority of the channels. However, there are few channels experience signal drop-off ( <40% signal strength) periodically. The length of cable from antenna to TV is about 65+ feet. I am thinking the long cable run might have caused weaken signal for those channels. Do you think an amplifier or a preamp would help?

Thanks.
rpca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Aug-2013, 8:46 PM   #8
ADTech
Antennas Direct Tech Supp
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,942
No. You have ample signal strength, enough to service hundreds of feet of coax. You'll need to work on quality of the signal. Most likely, your problems are due to the hill(s) in your signal path towards SF and you'll need to experiment with antenna height and location.

First, try to identify the specific channels/stations you'd having issues with.
__________________
Antennas Direct Tech Support

For support and recommendations regarding our products, please contact us directly at https://www.antennasdirect.com/customer-service.html

Sorry, I'm not a mod and cannot assist with your site registration.
ADTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back   TV Fool > Over The Air Services > Help With Reception


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC