|
I think the vertical scale exaggeration is misleading you.
The average peaks on your side are at 680 feet; the tall one is only 15 feet more than that average. It would be difficult to see that difference when standing there, but that peak does project into the signal path, and it can't be ignored.
That extra 15 feet probably isn't any more than the height of the trees.
Also, the resolution of the measurement data probably isn't that precise.
Sorry, didn't mean to mislead you, I was just curious to see what a close-up profile would show.
|