View Single Post
Old 16-Jul-2016, 11:13 PM   #5
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,725
Your report repeated for reference:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...e2cbfa5f7ed489

Quote:
At one point during the day CH7 had a 100% Symbol Quality at the same time, adjacent CH9 was zero. I did a spectral scan.
Thanks for the new scan. They both LOOK pretty healthy. CH 9 is almost as strong as 7, but 9 has a tilt in the channel level and its pilot carrier isn't as well defined.



The only differences I can find are 9 is running a little less power, its antenna is a little lower, and it is on a higher frequency which will change the scattering of its signal from the rough terrain.

But, the tuner makes the final decision on signal quality (SNR & errors), and it says NO GO for 9.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg acatTVFscan7-9_1.jpg (118.5 KB, 852 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 17-Jul-2016 at 12:20 AM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote