View Single Post
Old 8-Feb-2011, 4:57 PM   #2
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
Of the two antennas you mention, the RCA 3036 is the better choice by far. The Phillips is a UHF only antenna, which would lack coverage of real channels 5, 8, 10 and 13.

The manufacture's web site does not offer gain specifications, but only a vague estimate of mileage. Presuming the RCA design has similar performance to other brands of the same general dimensions, I would expect about 8 dB of gain from the UHF section which should be adequate to receive WNPX (real 36).

You are facing the challenge of 1 and 2 edge paths for almost every signal. A Winegard HD8200U would give you some additional gain that could overcome the fading and multipath common to those conditions.

You will likely need a preamp, especially if you are going to split to multiple sets. A Winegard HDP-269 would be one choice with very little risk of overload. You may want to run an FM-fool report to see if you have strong FM stations near you. If not, you could go with any number of other preamps having lower input ratings. When I run an FM-fool report at the ZIP code level, I see several strong FM signals.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 8-Feb-2011 at 5:14 PM.
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote