View Single Post
Old 26-Jun-2016, 6:27 PM   #4
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,753
Quote:
Since the signal quality is quite good (most times) I was wondering if there is
a solution for picking up WGRZ reliably.
I doubt that WGRZ will ever be 100% reliable, but you might be able to improve the reception if you are willing to spend more time and money on the project.
Quote:
I know there is a trial and error curve, but I am at a loss as to what to try next.
There are a few things you can try; no guarantee.
Quote:
Maybe there is another antenna that would be better for me?
With a NM of -10.7 dB for WGRZ, a little more antenna gain might help.

The C4 gain is about 12.0 dBi at 587 MHz.
https://www.antennasdirect.com/cmss_...-sellsheet.pdf

The DB8e is about 16.0 dBi with both panels aimed in the same direction
https://www.antennasdirect.com/cmss_files/attachmentlibrary/Technical%20Data%20PDF's/DB8E-TDS.pdf

The 91XG is about 14.5 dBi
https://www.antennasdirect.com/cmss_files/attachmentlibrary/Technical%20Data%20PDF's/91XG-TDS.pdf

and the 91XG has a tilt adjustment that would allow you to tilt the front end of the antenna up to better catch the incoming signal

Attached Images
File Type: jpg newmguyTVFp2WGRZlast10.JPG (80.9 KB, 2421 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 26-Jun-2016 at 6:29 PM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote