View Single Post
Old 25-Apr-2016, 7:34 PM   #18
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,753
ADTech's conservative advice is also valid. The lower gain preamps, like the CM7778 and the AD Juice, have sufficient gain to cover distribution losses. Once the signals are amplified by the preamp, they are better protected from distribution losses. A 3 dB loss between the antenna and the preamp input can be 10x worse than a 3 dB loss after the preamp. So, keep the coax between the antenna and the preamp input short, because that loss directly subtracts from the antenna gain and increases the System Noise Figure. Here is an example of how much difference the placement of a 3 dB loss can make:







The preamp Noise Figure is important because it primarily determines the System Noise figure because of its location at the head end, according to the Friis Noise Figure equation; the lower the figure, the better able you are to receive weak signals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friis_formulas_for_noise

You can do your own calculations for your system using the Systm Noise Figure Calculator by holl_ands and majortom:
http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/files/ota

http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/file...=0&w=1&s=0&z=4
Attached Images
File Type: jpg adrianpaulwoodAVStest1.JPG (75.6 KB, 2582 views)
File Type: jpg adrianpaulwoodAVStest2.JPG (75.6 KB, 2571 views)
File Type: jpg adrianpaulwoodAVStest3.JPG (76.5 KB, 2605 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 25-Apr-2016 at 7:56 PM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote