View Single Post
Old 19-Jan-2011, 10:50 PM   #8
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
At this point we are all working with data that may or may not be representative of the real conditions at trijon04's location. From the posted TV Fool Report:
Quote:
WARNING: Address was only resolved to city level and might not be that close to your actual location. For more accurate results, try entering a specific address or coordinates.
A report based on the actual site location may look similar or it may show dramatically different signal conditions.

I agree with John, a single combination antenna should easily serve in the situation represented in the first posted TVF report. The antenna I suggested would provide reception of the low VHF channels shown in the report. Still, the Antennas Direct combination should be quite capable (based on the original TVF report).

It sounds as if ADTech is willing to help sort out the difficulty using the Antennas Direct products. That's the logical next step. AD has shown a sincere willingness to help their customers, I would certainly recommend you let them have a chance to help you in this case.

I would be cautious about buying another antenna without first working with ADTech, and also running a TVF report based on the site address or coordinates.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 20-Jan-2011 at 12:39 AM.
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote