View Single Post
Old 6-May-2015, 11:15 PM   #5
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,753
Hi, Harold:

Quote:
Is it good enough?
Probably not for 100% reliable reception under all conditions, but it has been done at times because the tvfool report is only a computer simulation. If you are willing to take a gamble, go for it. You can see how the signal runs out of energy by the time it reaches your location. It is in your favor that you are in the "wide open spaces."





Quote:
What rooftop at 27 height would work?
You would need to go to 200 ft to get your K30JP NM up to -10.2:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...f1f051db74fc37

and up to 400 ft to get it up to +1.4 dB:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...f1f06b12a09a2f

A Noise Margin of zero is the weakest signal that can be received. You can add your antenna gain of about 13 dB, which brings the NM up to +1.9 dB. You can also add your preamp gain, but you must subtract its noise figure (NF), because its internal noise reduces the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) of the signal. This should give you enough gain to overcome the coax loss and will improve the system noise figure.

Disclaimer: I can't guarantee that this will work; you are on your own. I never want to discourage anyone from doing antenna experiments. I always learn something from my antenna experiments, especially the ones that don't work because I have to figure out why they didn't.



Interpreting Noise Margin in the TV Fool Report
http://www.aa6g.org/DTV/Reception/tvfool_nm.html

Attached Images
File Type: jpg haroldTVFK30JPcoverage.jpg (162.2 KB, 2870 views)
File Type: jpg NMChartC.jpg (71.3 KB, 2901 views)
File Type: jpg NoiseMargin.jpg (60.1 KB, 2942 views)
File Type: jpg HaroldTVFK30Jprofile.JPG (61.7 KB, 3022 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 17-May-2015 at 2:30 PM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote