Quote:
|
OK - thanks for your patience. I'm clearly a neophyte here.
|
I'm still learning, too.
Thanks for the photos.
Oh, my. First it was the hills, and now it's the trees.
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/antennas/siting.html
scroll down to
Trees and UHF
http://www.wrightsaerials.co.uk/refe...-reception.pdf
Your first photo reminds me of this:
In the photo above Kevin is using a WG 7697P. If you want to read more about his tree problem:
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/25-hdt...l#post17280909
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/25-hdt...l#post17283385
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/25-hdt...l#post17297708
ADTech's post about trees:
http://forum.tvfool.com/showpost.php...90&postcount=3
Quote:
|
View towards 24 degrees (channels 10, 25, 35) -- The hill involved is visible in the center.
|
Umm, I don't see the hill, but the trees don't look as bad.
However, the signals from 24 degrees are a little weaker.
Is there any location on your lot that doesn't have trees in the path from 244?
How difficult would it be to go higher?
Here is a list of networks in your zip code from rabbitears.info. Click on a call sign and it will expand to show subchannels.
http://www.rabbitears.info/search.ph...pe=dBm&height=
The tvfool report is only a computer simulation; sometimes it's a little off (either way) especially with 2Edge signals. There is a little less hope now, but you might want to take a gamble with a test to satisfy your own curiosity, before getting any deeper into this.