View Single Post
Old 9-Oct-2014, 4:14 AM   #3
cchobbs
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3
Thanks very much for the reply, you make good sense. I hadn't noticed the co channel situation. Now my best choice looks like the C2V.

I figure I'll stop trying to get the far away stations to the south (from Seattle)...except for Fox, which shows around -3 dB NM on channel 13, so maybe the C2V would be able to get that. Wider beamwidth on the C2V as well. Any feedback or tips would be appreciated.

One last question. When I'm generating reports I'm getting a better NM value for ch 13 with a lower height setting. How come? Does this have to do with reflections or edging...or am I misunderstanding the negative NM values.

Here are the reports for reference:

At 10 ft, ch 13 shows -0.7 dB NM

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...d243a5ccaa1c83

At 25 ft, ch 13 shows -3.1

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...d2436b56a372e0

Thanks again, c.
cchobbs is offline   Reply With Quote