|
The HBU-33 is going to offer more H-VHF (real CH-7 through CH-13) gain than the dipole section of the C2V. Offhand, I don't think there will be much difference in the UHF performance.
So, yes the HBU-33 could be considered an alternate for the C2V.
The added gain of the larger versions (HBU-44 & 55 or the Winegard HD7698P) would still be my recommendation if the C2V can't be adjusted to give satisfactory performance. Again, based on your TV Fool signal report, the C2V appears to be a very good choice. I don't have any reason to speak poorly of it.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)
(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')
|