View Single Post
Old 3-Dec-2010, 2:08 PM   #6
Tigerbangs
TV Reception Maven
 
Tigerbangs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 339
Send a message via AIM to Tigerbangs Send a message via Yahoo to Tigerbangs
To answer your question, you are in an area with very few viable stations. Many of the stations that you ARE seeing are likely the result of tropospheric skip, and wouldn't be likely to be reliable 24/7. It does sound as if you are doing well with the 4228, and I believe that switching to an XG-91 won't do a lot for your UHF, and would likely hurt your existing VHF reception. Frankly, you sound as if you are doing about as well as could be possibly expected with what you have.
Tigerbangs is offline   Reply With Quote