View Single Post
Old 13-Jan-2014, 3:46 AM   #5
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie84 View Post
thanks..to summarize your post
i can "possibly" get 3 of the channels with the uhf db8e

and you think the Y10713 is strong enough (using only the theory that it does NOT cost a lot compared to other long range antennas)

i have looked at other antennas in neighborhood and they all appear to bigger versions of theY10713 looks like a "winegard" monster

about to search this forum for info on preamp's

i just like to research a lot before i invest
The Y10713 is a 'cut-for-band' antenna. It's a specialty antenna intended for reception of High-VHF (real channels 7 through 13) only. In that role, it's the best performing product available until you step up to an industrial / commercial option. I paid less than $20 for mine recently, and am quite confident that this is the best option available when going after medium and weak strength H-VHF signals.

The DB8e is also a cut-to-band antenna, but designed for UHF, real CH-14 through CH-51. It can be adjusted for narrow forward beam or wide forward beam. The combination of the DB8e and Y10713 offer you the ability to fine tune aim more than a single antenna with multi-band coverage.

I own a TVPRAMP1R and use it in an application that has considerably stronger signals than shown in your report. I have had no overloading problems, a common problem with high gain amplifiers. It's also on of the few amplifiers that has separate inputs for a UHF and VHF antenna. http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=13530
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 13-Jan-2014 at 3:50 AM. Reason: TVPRAMP1R
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote