View Single Post
Old 10-Nov-2013, 1:39 AM   #2
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
I own a DB4e and am throughly impressed and satisfied with it's UHF capability. BUT... Antenna location is often the most important single factor. The right antenna, mounted in a location with poor signal conditions is going to fail to perform well. Have you tried alternate locations? No point spending more money until you have exhausted the possibility that there is a good location for the C2-V

As long as you are getting reliable reception with the VHF dipole of the C2-V ('reflector' per the AD marketing dept. ), I would suggest you stick with it. As long as you can work out a reliable mounting method for the dipole, it can be combined with any UHF antenna by simply using the UHF/VHF combiner.

The HDHR "Signal Quality" measurement is by far the most important parameter to optimize. "Signal Strength" is irrelevant if the signal is of poor quality.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')

Last edited by GroundUrMast; 10-Nov-2013 at 1:43 AM.
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote