I do not receive "ch 4 wock" at all as far as I know. It may come in on them rare occasions would be it. I guess I forgot to mention that we mainly watch stations from Chicago and south bend (compass headings 345 and 48-49), with the south bend stations being more reliable. Looking at the "Pending Applications Included tvfool channel list", I receive and watch stations from the top down to WNIT 34.1 with my CA8100 with 90-95% reliability. My antenna mast is in concrete and can not be moved, so I will need to work with what I have. I have no trees line of sight in heading 345 closer then 400ft, and in heading 48-49 I have 3 trees that are around 80-120 ft from the antenna in that direction, then nothing else for miles. and the antenna is above all buildings within miles. if it will help, I can take some pictures and post them so you can see the line of site in both directions. I do not have the loop setup with my coax, and it is rg6 also.
My TV I bought in 2007, it is a Samsung HL-T5687SA, so its a 56", and it does have the built in digital TV tuner. Yes, my CA8100 is still working, it has 1 of the long elements broken off, but from what I have read, the long ones are for low VHF? I have 2 other older TV's hooked up with set top boxes.
So now with all this new information, will a new antenna gain me enough to make it worth the money and effort? or shouls I just change out the pre-amp? what is better about the KT-200 over the AP8275?
|