View Single Post
Old 16-Oct-2012, 6:40 PM   #8
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
It's hard to argue with success.

You're correct, the UHF and High-VHF performance of your existing antennas matches or exceeds those I've suggested. The critical difference is that each of the suggested antennas includes support for Low-VHF. Hopefully your current system will continue to provide reliable reception. If not, the antennas I've mentioned are appropriate solutions when mounted outside in the clear.

Cheers
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote