Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterMe
It is not the HD9697P; it is the 7697P. If restricted to a choice between the HD7694P AND THE HD7697P, then I would go with the HD7697P. It should easily pull in the Hi-VHF and UHF stations in Rockford. If, however, I could get the Rockford stations, then I would also want other stations of similar signal strength. You have Lo-VHF stations like WLFM RF-6 and WWAZ RF-5 in this group. You like Winegard. Consider the HD7084P. |
Yes, sorry... I meant the HD7697P.
It is my understanding that the Lo-VHF stations will eventually be moved out of the Lo-VHF range? Also WLFM and WWAZ are of no interest to me. That's why I disregarded the Lo-VHF range altogether.
I'm not partial to Winegard. They just seem to make a good quality product from what I've read. If you have a solution from another manufacturer, I'm open to it.
So even without a rotor, you think a roof-mounted antenna would get Rockford (which is nearly 180° from Chicago)?