Hello,
I ran the TV Signal Analysis results twice. On the first run, I put the height of the antenna at 10 ft. (for grins and giggles). It gave these results back:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...9fbe8762041bf7
I ran a second time at antenna height of 35 feet and it gave these results which are worse then at 10 feet (by looking at the "red" background" color. In addition I looked at the NM(DB) and those support what I'm saying (check out station WBFF):
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...9fbe8e5810c62e
So this created some questions for me and not sure which is right, if anyone can clue me in, it would be appreciated:
- The results on 10 feet and 35 feet are not accurate and I should ignore the descrepency
- The results show that 35 feet are better and I need to learn how to read a chart
- There is a disadvantage to mount an antenna higher (which goes against my logic)
- it's automatically configuring cable length and taking that into consideration
Any ideas? I have my antenna currently mounted temporarily at 15 feet and was going to mount it on my roof at 35 feet but if I get a worse signal at that height then it makes no sense to do it.
-Chuck