Quote:
Originally Posted by ADTech
The 91XG is an extremely low volume niche item ...
|
I'm surprised especially since:
- UHF signals do not travel as far as VHF given the same transmitter power
- The majority of DTV stations are now UHF
- OTA provides free HDTV for which cable providers charge a premium
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADTech
If and when it should become available, it will be listed on our website first.
|
I would be happy to purchase a 14-51 91XG directly from AD's website.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADTech
C4. Its better efficiency often makes the difference over raw gain, especially at the low end of the UHF scale. I've used it to pull in stations at the lower end of the range that a 91XG couldn't. Above channels 25-30, the 91XG or the DB8 will outperform since they're peaked at the high end.
|
1.) Aren't yagi-type antennas like the 91XG recommended over bowtie type arrays in areas with multipath issues?
2.) Which has less windload?
- a vertically-oriented antenna such as a C4 or DB8
- a horizontally-oriented yagi antenna such as the 91XG
3.) Which antenna type is recommended for double-edge-diffraction reception areas?
Thanks