![]() |
Need help with maps . . .
I'm trying to help a friend find what is available where he lives. These maps and links are beyond confusing.
Here is the analysis, but I don't really know what I'm looking at. The coded colors are very faint and hard to decipher: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...90384ce526cde4 Also, there is a way of making a side (profile) view of the terrain, etc. showing the signals as they go through the air. Somebody (Rabbit?) did this for me a few years ago and I'd like to get this for my buddy. But the myriad of links and unfamiliar terms has me lost. Help? |
Hello, Dagwood
Thank you for the report for your friend. There is only one strong signal in the green, none in yellow, 4 in the red, and the rest in grey are very weak. Doesn't look very promising. http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1501512769 I can do a terrain profile for you. Please send me his address in a PM and tell me what channel it is for, so that it will be accurate. Is his house surrounded by trees like your house is? |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I looked at the satellite view. You are right; it does look worse than your location. He is surrounded by trees that will block TV signals: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....4&d=1565877710 and he is down a hill: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....5&d=1565879135 Even with a big antenna as high as he can get it, he will not be able to get much. |
3 Attachment(s)
This is an image of his signal report:
https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....6&d=1565882026 The above report is based on his address, which is from a marker further down the hill. This report is based on the coordinates of his house which is at the north end of his lot (I think), further up the hill; the signals are stronger: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....7&d=1565882095 This is the link for the revised TVFool report based on the coordinates of his house: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...90386a1d9f6f12 This report is from rabbitears.info: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....8&d=1565882420 This is the link for the rabbitears.info report: https://www.rabbitears.info/searchma...&study_id=4518 He might have a chance of getting a few of the ones at the top if he uses a Solid Signal HDB91X or an Antennas Direct 91XG antenna and a preamp like the Antennas Direct Juice or the older Antennas Direct PA18. |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
If you click on the rabbitears.info report for his location https://www.rabbitears.info/searchma...&study_id=4518 and then click on the Transmitter Distance (Miles) for a channel, a profile for that channel will come up. This is what the WPXJ terrain profile looks like. The red line is the direct signal path blocked by terrain; the blue line is the probable signal path. https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....9&d=1565891253 There is a profile available from TVFool, but it is no longer correct because the WPXJ transmitter moved when it changed real channels from 23 to 24: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...dALLTV%26n%3d1 This is the WPXJ profile using other software: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....0&d=1565893676 |
So Rabbit, boiling this all down, what would he get with the biggest roof antenna with a booster and rotor?
Also, you got this for my location a couple of years ago. How did you generate it and can we get one for my buddy's house? http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1505609634 |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
My guess is that he has a good chance of getting a few of the strongest ones at the top, but it isn't possible for me to give a guarantee. Quote:
WROC has moved to channel 21, but the transmitter is still at the same location. This is the profile by TVFool for his location: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...dALLTV%26n%3d8 This is the WROC profile from the rabbitears.info report for his location by clicking on distance in the report: https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....1&d=1565895259 https://forum.tvfool.com/attachment....2&d=1565897142 Again, the terrain blocks the signal even before it gets to the TREES. |
Hi Dagwood! Hope you are enjoying your nice summer weather!
My experience tells me that reception will depend mostly on the trees nearest to the home. I think the reports from TV fool and Rabbitears are erroneous. In order of reception likelyhood: 1. WPXJ Batavia due to antenna height/distance 2/3 WHEC/WHAM due to hi VHF penetration 3-5 WROC, WUHF and WXXI due to proximity. The rest: WKBW/WGRZ due to elevation of transmitter site Syracuse stations due to less dense trees in that direction. A large VHF/UHF antenna up as high as possible will yield the best results. Possibly a VHF antenna aimed at WHEC/WHAM and a UHF antenna aimed at WPXJ/WKBW/WGRZ. Finally, Have you gotten WROC, WXXI and WUHF more reliably???? |
A big antenna for UHF and VHF-High like the Winegard HD7698P might pick up some of the Rochester VHF channels.
|
Quote:
FWIW: He is a 78 year-old lunch buddy that lives a couple miles north of me. He had some analog reception back in the day but hasn't bothered with any of it since digital. But as your posts show, channel 51 was the strongest and he said he did used to get it. Just recently, another lunch buddy gave him a small antenna and a good length of coax to try out. I told them both about this site and how well it can predict signal strength no matter where you live. So now we know that he's out of luck, at least with this small antenna he has. |
Quote:
Yes, channel 51 from Batavia is his strongest signal, as noted in my post to Rabbit above. As for me: I'm sure all you guys here are aware of the mandated changes some channels had to do recently. There was little to no warning for us -- all of a sudden no signal. One of my weaker stations, channel 8, was out for days because they switched to partial power during the switch-over. But when it came back on, they are now one of my strongest stations. Something about the new frequency penetrating out farther. One of the other stations had to put up a new antenna, which they had on-site, but the crane they had wasn't big enough for the job, lol. But they got through it eventually. They were at partial power also, but I could still get them off and on meantime. Last point: A year or two ago I had posted about a signal problem I was getting ONLY with channel 13. Then I found that if I monkeyed with the coax terminal on the TV it would come in okay, and someone here said that yes, it's possible the problem could be the cable, even though it only affected one channel. So recently I was having that problem again, but ONLY with the living room TV; bedroom was okay. So I replaced that length of coax and the problem went away. :) You guys are amazing -- thanks again to all for the help. :D PS: I have not gotten stuck on the roof again with wind blowing the ladder down. :eek: |
Dagwood,
Glad to hear that your reception of Rochester, NY stations has improved. Because all the stations are so close together on Pinnacle Hill in Brighton, it really makes things hard for the engineers of all the stations in that location. We're baking here today..... Ah but it's a dry heat, LOL Joe in AZ |
Quote:
I thought they would be done with all this, but apparently not. What's going on and when will it end? EDIT, Thursday morning @ 8:11: Within a few minutes of 12:30 AM today, every single station went dead. Quote:
|
There are not many good broadcasting option sites for
Rochester, NY radio and television. That is why Pinnacle Hill is so crowded. That is why when one station has issues, at times, all the stations must cease operations..... WBGT, a low power station broadcasting from NW of downtown Rochester is the only station I know of that is still on the air. They are a My Network affiliate. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © TV Fool, LLC