TV signal dilemma
 

We have moved to a new home this weekend and would like to continue OTA TV without cable. However, I have a dilemma in determining what I need to pull in at least the 4 major networks, i.e., ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX. Based on the report, see link below, I have 3 weak signals....NBC, CBS and FOX.

To complicate matters, NBC and FOX come from transmitters at 50 deg while CBS come from transmitters at 332 deg.

The dilemma is what antenna's and preamplifiers I will need to receive all 4 networks. I could get an omnidirectional, but never dealt with one, and feel they won't give me the gain for the weaker networks. Or, I could get 2 directional antenna's and one preamplifier.

I would greatly appreciate any insight into translating the report into a guide in determining the equipment needed. Thanks in advance .

Mike

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...e6a4e05779359f

Welcome!

Congratulations on your new home!
It is rare to see such weak signals from such
close distances. I can only surmise that your area
is in a valley or surrounded by obstructing hills.
I cannot imagine any omni directional or bi directional
antenna working in your situation. You could try
a bow tie or similar antenna aimed at the 3 major
networks in your area. MCM electronics makes some
inexpensive 4 bay bow tie antennas or you could opt
for an 8 bay, two panel antenna directed for CBS,
NBC and Fox with the other panel aimed for ABC.
You might also consider getting an antenna to
receive the NYC market stations. That would be
a Winegard 7698P available at walmart.com for
just over $100 including shipping. I would certainly
start slowly and make sure you can return anything
that doesn't work well....

Thanks for your input. Just tried a small directional antenna from Wal-Mart. Actually the best outdoor antenna for $40 in stock at closest store. Tried tuners in a TV as well as a TiVo. Getting no signal at all, even on ABC.

Surprised you didn't even get ABC. That signal, while less
than 25 miles away, should have been viewable. What kind
of cable were you using and how long??? RG6 is the best
option to use. Keep your cable runs 50 feet and under.
Did you try the antenna from your roof or elsewhere???

My test setup was on my roof (approx 30'). Brought up small tv and a TiVo. Anttena to device was 4' rg6 coax. Seems improbable not to see even a hint of signal. Can't imagine a bad antenna. I may play around some more, but if I can't see any signal, I will forget OTA

What model "small directional antenna from Wal-Mart" are you using for testing? Some (like the little flat panel ones) have very little gain on VHF.

Your situation is a difficult one.

The best you can do is to experiment. Others will post, but if this were my plot I would likely try something like this:

For UHF channels I'd try an Antennas Direct DB-8e with one panel aimed northeast and one aimed southeast.

Your northeast channels come from about 60 degrees on a compass (WCCT-20/CW, WVIT-35/NBC, WFSB-33/CBS, WTIC-31/FOX) and your southeast channels come from 120 degrees (WCTX-39/MyN) and 192 degrees (WEDW-49/PBS). The DB-8e works best when aimed in two different directions if the directions are 90 degrees apart. So you'd have to experiment, and may have to aim at 45 degrees and 135 degrees.

If that doesn't get you the channels from both the NE and SE you can aim both panels at about 60 degrees.

Also, an amplifier might be useful.

For your VHF-HI channel (WTNH-10/ABC) I'd try a Stellar Labs (30-2476) MCM Part #30-2476 aimed at 120 degrees.

Antennas Direct has one of the best VHF/UHF Combiners. And if you need to amplify the UHF signal you can also try an amplifier (there are a few good options, but several not-so-good ones).

I hope others also post to give thier thoughts on this. There are other possibilities, including a large all-channel antenna and a rotor. But the downside of that is not being to use a DVR.

The antenna is GE Pro Outdoor Antenna
https://www.walmart.com/ip/GE-Pro-Ou...&wl13=&veh=sem

Thanks for your suggestions..... I haven't given up yet, but based on what I've seen so far it isn't looking good. My previous experience has been to see some indication of a signal using Tivos signal strength function even on channels with no chance of getting a picture. Now its like there is nothing connected to the TiVo.

The antenna you tried doesn't have the gain required
in your situation. An FYI, both Jake V and I suggested
you try an 8 bay antenna for your "local" stations. His
suggestion will cost more than twice the price and not
perform better. The MCM 30-2430 costs just $55.00.
With one panel aimed NE and the other towards SE,
in addtition to NBC, CBS, Fox, etc. you have a good
chance of getting WCTX and WEDW.
It might just also work on WTNH, ABC.

I'd also agree that the MCM 30-2476 could be used if
the above does not work for WTNH. It is going to take
a good deal of trial and error. Rarely does everything
fall into place.............

After taking another look at the tvfool report, it looks like I might be able to receive CBS, NBC and FOX pointing the UHF antenna JoeAZ suggested. By directing both panels to 50 deg would hopefully have the most gain. If it works, I'll try adding a VHF antenna to get ABC pointing at 107 deg. I plan to get the MCM 30-2430 antenna first and if this fails I guess I have to forget OTA tv. If it works, the next step is to add a VHF antenna with a combiner/amplifier which bring up the next question. Is a separate combiner amplifier better than an all-in-one like the Channel Master 7777. I would like to purchase/install the MCM 30-2430 and combiner/amplifier in preparation to adding the VHF antenna. Any suggestions regarding what devices I should consider to combine/amplify these weak (or non existent) signals.

I am sure "Ad Tech" or some others can recommend what else
you may need electronically. The MCM combiners, splitters, etc,
etc, are mediocre at best. I believe some of the other posts
contain scientific measurements of performance for combiners,
splitters, etc, etc. You may want to review some of the more
recent posts for the last couple of weeks.....

I have a similar situation. See "Reception Help in NH" thread. I would try the cheap UHF antennas first as others suggest. Not jump straight to the DB8e. Try either the MCM30-2430 8-bay or the 30-2370 yagi. Both of these are also sold by Solid Signal under different names (HDB8X and HDB91X). I have had reasonable deep fringe performance from both of these. I would also recommend the RCA TVPRAMP1R, which I have had good luck with. (buy from walmart.com, not amazon, due to high failure rates from amazon). It has separate UHF and VHF inputs, so when you add your VHF yagi (I recommend the MCM-30-2476), you will be ready to go. NM of -3 is tough, but not impossible, and you will likely need to "walk the roof" to find the hot-spot(s). In my situation, mere inches actually matter. Hopefully you can find a hot-spot that satisfies all four major networks.

You also might want to check rabbitears.com. They list all of the subchannels for each channel. Sometimes major networks are actually on subchannels.

Most likely you are out of luck. I doubt that you will get CBS at all, and NBC only when the weather is "right". (Tropospheric effect.)

If you click on the channel in your report you will see the terrain profile showing what is between the tower and your house. On CBS you are in a deep RF shadow and NBC is not much better.

At 90 miles, a NM of only 3.1 for both, 30k power, (at your house), for CBS and 300k for NBC you will have to go to extreme measures to receive them reliably, if at all.

Whatever you buy, make sure of what the return policy is, you'll need it.

In your case I would consider the AD 91XG or one of its clones for your UHF antenna. This is because your hardest network is CBS with both WFSB and WCBS on channel 33. They will interfere with each other unless you have an antenna with significant front to back ratio. The 91XG beats the DB-8e by 10 db. I agree with the suggestion of the MCM VHF antenna and the TV-PRAMP-1. The antenna location should be as clear as possible toward Hartford.

You may not get everything with this setup, but the most critical networks will have the best chances.

Is that cliff and the corresponding shadow from the terrain report real? The topography databases sometimes include trees, which although bad, probably aren't nearly as dramatic an effect as the terrain profile plots suggest.

Also rickbb, I think he's after WVIT (NBC, ch35, 24 miles) and WFSB (CBS, Ch33, 28.7 miles) not WRGB (CBS, Ch6, 90 miles)

rickbb: "If you click on the channel in your report you will see the terrain profile showing what is between the tower and your house. On CBS you are in a deep RF shadow and NBC is not much better."
Not sure where my location is on the terrain profile? Assume its at the very end of profile opposite the transmitter.

Tower Guy: In your case I would consider the AD 91XG or one of its clones for your UHF antenna
DARN....I placed an order for the MCM30-2430 about 2 hours ago!!!

jrgagne99: Is that cliff and the corresponding shadow from the terrain report real? The topography databases sometimes include trees, which although bad, probably aren't nearly as dramatic an effect as the terrain profile plots suggest.
Not sure I am reading the profile correctly...see above reply to rickbb

jrgagne99, I think he's after WVIT (NBC, ch35, 24 miles) and WFSB (CBS, Ch33, 28.7 miles) not WRGB (CBS, Ch6, 90 miles)
Correct....WFSB because transmitter is same direction as NBC and FOX (WTIC) since a rotor is out of the question.

Yes, your location is all the way on the right.

If you act quickly before it ships, you can probably change to the AD 91XG clone (MCM 30-2370)

The difference between the 8 Bay and the yagi is that the yagi is
more directional and may be better with your CBS situation.
However, As was recently demonstrated in another blog on this
site, UHF yagi antennas favor the higher UHF frequencies which
are no longer in use. With the repack coming soon, the Yagi
will be at an even greater disadvantage......UHF TV will end at
Rf 36....

Bit the bullet and ordered the MCM 30-2370. As soon as i receive antennas I will report results. Thanks to everyone for the help....I'm learning to make better use of tvfool as well.

The closer CBS has a worse NM -1.2 which will make it harder to get than the further one. My bad on the NBC, it is close, but still a low NM and Kw at the antenna will make it hard to get.

The terrain profiles are real but the elevations are exaggerated in the graph to make them easier to read. They DO NOT include trees or buildings, just topographic data from the USGS.

They also do not include tropospheric effects. Sometimes you can get a signal from very far away as it's "bounced" off of the ionosphere. It's how I used to listen to Chicago radio stations late at night here in North Carolina back in the AM radio days. But it only came in at night when the atmosphere was in the shadow of the suns RF interference.

Correct, the transmitter is on the left and your location is on the right.

I think the deep chasm at the right is an artifact of the plot, i.e. not real. The feature seems to appear in a number of different terrain profile plots (mine included) where there is clearly no cliff-face.

Actually, 30.2 KW on channel 6 is high power for low VHF. Yet TVfool does not subtract the 4 db extra low band noise that is added into the FCC coverage of low band. Even then, none of the antennas suggested are designed for low band.

The difference in noise and the higher gain of UHF antennas will make reception of WFSB easier than WRGB.

I don't have your exact location coordinates by PM, but I think the 2Edge designation for WVIT is correct; there is terrain interference.

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499368501

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499368501

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499368501

I agree there is interference, but it is not as bad as the TVfool terrain plot suggests. The terrain plot makes it look like the antenna is at the bottom of Clayton Ravine.

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499371918

rabbit73, thanks for those images. They are showing exactly what my problem is. In the 3rd image (google) you can see where the signal is stronger prior to the last peak before the antenna. I'm curious how you obtained the 1st image showing the elevations, etc.

I'm glad that you found it helpful and have confirmed that the hill exists.
The tvfool terrain profile gave me a clue that there might be a problem, so I used a different software for the terrain profile found here:
http://www.heywhatsthat.com/profiler.html

To use the software, I had to enter your coordinates and the coordinates of the transmitter. Since I don't know the coordinates of your antenna, I had to make an estimate derived from your tvfool report. So, there could be some errors from that, along with some inherent in the software.

It takes a while to learn how to use it, because there isn't much in the way of directions.

jrgagne99 has some doubts about the accuracy of the software. In his case, it shows a hill in the signal path that he says isn't there. I think what happened in his case, there is a tall stand of trees in the signal path that was read as an increase in elevation. The elevation readings were probably done by aerial survey, which might include the height of the trees. Years ago, elevation was measured on the ground from benchmarks. In the final analysis, it's just as damaging to the signal as a hill.

I think this is what he remembers:

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1474416567

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...2&d=1474417001

This is his thread:
http://forum.tvfool.com/showthread.php?t=16101

This view supports JR's contention that there isn't much of a nearby hill in the WCAX signal path, but there are certainly a lot of trees, unless they have been clear cut.

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499380880

TV Signal Dilemma
 

With the repack coming soon, the Yagi
will be at an even greater disadvantage......UHF TV will end at
Rf 36.... JoeAZ: Would you please post a link to your above comment? I've been reading up on the FCC repack this holiday as to how it might effect OTA reception, and did not see anything about UHF frequencies ending at Rf36, only around Rf51. Not doubting you, but just would like to hear it from the FCC horses mouth. :D

At least we have another 36 plus months (maybe more) before it finally settles down, hopefully. I know the FCC did say they did not want OTA viewers to have to scan their TVs more than twice to update broadcasters changes, or once for viewers to adjust their directional antennas rooftop or indoors. How kind of them!

But I guess this all came about to give more spectrum for cell phones. T Mobile got the lions share at auction with around 8 billion bid! I should have realized when watching Star Trek back in the 1960s, that the crews communicators would be all the rage in the 21st century! Geez.....

Before the Incentive Auction ("repack") UHF was 14-51; after it will be 14-36. Before the auction, it wasn't clear how many channels would be left for TV broadcasting. One of the purposes of the auction was to determine how many channels would be left.

http://www.tvtechnology.com/resource...-abound/280362

Trip in Va started a repack thread on the AVS Forum:

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/25-hdt...um-repack.html

Trip runs the rabbitears.info site and works for the FCC, so he would qualify as the FCC horses mouth.

He also started a repack thread on the Canadian forum:
http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/81-o...epack-ota.html

You can see the Repack Plan here; it takes a long time to download:
https://www.rabbitears.info/repackchannels.php

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499385033

If you look up WVIT using that tool, you will see WVIT moving from 35 to 31:

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1499386213

You can also look it up here:

http://www.rabbitears.info/market.ph...&callsign=wvit

where you will see 35 > 31 by the WVIT callsign.

TV Signal Dilemma
 

Thanks for the quick reply and links rabbit73!

So.....what's your best guess regarding using our current antennas since UHF Rf is going to stop at 36? Will we need to something different for optimal reception???

We will need antennas rescaled for 14-36 for optimal reception, but I doubt we will see many made for the consumer market. Antenna manufacturers are not going to rescale and build antennas for the 14-36 UHF band unless they can make a profit doing it.

When the UHF band was cut to 14-51, very few manufacturers rescaled their antennas.

Regarding the comment by JoeAZ, yagis have a gain vs freq curve that slopes up, so they will have poor performance at the low end of UHF.

Anennas Direct didn't rescale the 91XG, but they did rescale their bowtie antennas for 14-51.

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1489973660

TV Signal Dilemma
 

Well, I'm sure you're going to be even more busy helping people solve their OTA reception issues over the next ten years, rabbit73--so don't plan on going anywhere; we need you now more than ever!

There's a lot to think about here and much more reading that I need to do to keep my TV viewing optimal in the next few years. I'm probably going to loose some sleep over this.....:eek:

Thanks again as always!

No OTA for Southbury, CT
 

Well the results are in.....time to search for other cord cutting solutions.

I tested both Steller Labs 30-2430 and 30-2370 raised 10' above roof top, with and without a pre-amp. Essentially no discernible difference in all my readings using the Tivo signal strength function.

WTNH (ABC) chan 8.1 was the only one where I was able to have a picture, although mostly pixelated. The other 2 UHF channel I was shooting for (WRGB and WVIT) showed a signal, but not enough for a picture.

WTNH (Real-10) would not be expected to come in on either the 2430 or the 2370. Neither would WRGB (Real-6). Only UHF (channels 14 and up). Regarding WVIT and WFSB (and maybe even WTIC), did you try "walking the roof" to find a sweetspot? In my deep fringe area, i see 10 dB or more variation over only a few feet in X, Y, and Z (sometimes even inches).

Yes...walked the roof as well as on the ground. Couldn't see much difference in all locations tried and definitely never pulled in a picture except ABC as noted previously.

I want to thank everyone for the information and help in my attempt to receive OTA TV at our new home. But for now I'm giving up....antenna are being returned.