Help in S.E.Va.
 

Have a single story brick ranch house.Put a Channel Master CM-4221HD antenna in the attic.Get about 30 channels but the two channels my wife wants are QVC (49.5) and HSN (49.6). They don"t come in good at all. Would a better antenna do the job or do I have to move the antenna I have outside? Prefer to keep antenna in attic but will move outside if it will be better.Will get a different antenna if it" better. Thanks for your help.
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...dfaf9632dd6b09

Welcome, JET4:

What direction is you antenna aimed?

Do you get ION 49.1 OK?

Your signals are very strong to the point of overload. The signal loss in the attic is difficult to predict because of differences in construction, but if your attic is average the 4221HD might have enough gain to cause overload.

A metal roof, aluminum foil thermal barrier, and aluminum, siding will block TV signals, as will trees or other buildings.

Are you using an amp?

To test the overload theory, insert an attenuator in the coax line. A 2-way splitter has a loss of 3.5dB; a 4 way, 7 dB. You might need even more attenuation than that.

For your location I would have picked the GE 34792 Attic antenna. I just assembled one for a friend in Newport News and he is using it inside on the first floor. He gets the channels you want OK

How long is the coax line from the antenna to the TV?

antenna aimed about 260 degrees on compass. wsw. ION 49.1 comes in good

no amp. new roof was just put on regular shingles. I can get GE attic antenna if it will be better

WPXV is 258 degrees magnetic by compass.

If you get ION OK, then you should be getting QVC and HSN OK because they are all on the same channel. Try slightly different locations in the attic and an attenuator. Keep adding more attenuation to see what happens. Does your TV have a signal strength indicator?

I can't guarantee that it will be better because I'm not 100% certain yet what the problem is. Let's try some attenuation first with the antenna you have.

This is my friend's report; your signals are 10 dB stronger.

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...dfafa556f19277

This is the attenuator I used when testing his antenna. I was able to insert the full 20 dB attenuation for his strongest signals without them dropping out. CH 13 was a little weaker because the GE antenna has less gain for VHF-High signals.

https://www.antennasdirect.com/store...ttenuator.html

Also here
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Antennas-...uator/43160862

I bought mine here:

http://www.solidsignal.com/pview.asp?p=att-1

The knob on the attenuator works like a volume control with multiple turns. Turn it clockwise to make the signal stronger (less attenuation).

The GE 34792 is on sale at Walmart for $26.47 but requires some assembly. There is a video for that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qYucg3JXzA

coax line,antenna to tv about 20'

If it isn't overload, then it must be trees. I don't know your exact address, but I see a lot of trees in your area. Trees block TV signals.
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/antennas/siting.html
scroll down to Trees and UHF

The only other thing I can think of is interference to TV reception from your strong local FM signals.
http://www.fmfool.com/modeling/tmp/6...e/Radar-FM.png

Please let us know the results of your tests on this same thread.

Since most TVs deal with cable signal levels of 0 to
+15 db without issue, I don't think this is an overload issue
If you get the other 49 channels then there is no reason
You ma be getting co channel interference though the map doesn't show it

I ordered the attenuator that you used to check everything out.Will let you know when it's here and I tested it. Also a lot of trees between my house and the towers. The street in front of my house looks like a forest. Lol.

I agree. If you get 49.1, you should be getting 49.5 and 49.6.
You haven't stated the units, but you probably mean dBmV.

Yes, that is a good range for the input at the tuner, but his signals on his report are much stronger than that. The tvfool report assumes that the antenna is outside and in the clear. His antenna is in the attic and many trees are in the signal path. Now that he has told us about the trees (and I have seen the trees in a satellite view of his area), I am beginning to think it might NOT be an overload problem.

WHRO has a Noise Margin of 71.4 dB. If you add an antenna gain of 12 dB, that brings you up to 83.4 dB NM which is overload territory IF the antenna is outside and in the clear. But, his antenna is in the attic and there are trees in the signal path that can attenuate the signals.

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...6&d=1471824123

Interpreting Noise Margin in the TV Fool Report
http://www.aa6g.org/DTV/Reception/tvfool_nm.html

WHRO has a signal power of -19.4 dBm (+29.6 dBmV). If you add the antenna gain, that brings you up to -7.4 dBm (+41.6 dBmV) which is tuner overload.

ATSC Recommended Practice:
Receiver Performance Guidelines

Document A/74:2010, 7 April 2010

RECEIVER PERFORMANCE GUIDELINES

5.1 Sensitivity

5.2 Multi-Signal Overload

When there are more than Two Strong Input Signals:
Max Signal Input would need to be DERATED:
3 Signals: -3.6 dB
4 Signals: -5 dB
5 Signals: -6 dB
6 Signals: -7 dB
8 Signals: -8 dB
Ignore signals more than 6 dB below the Strongest.

In this case, signals stronger than -16 dBm (+33 dBmV) risk tuner overload. I have no idea how strong the signals are coming out of the 4221HD antenna in the attic, because the attenuation from the trees and the attic are unknown.

Were you using the attic antenna before the new roof? If you were, was there any change in reception after the new roof?

If the attenuator doesn't help, I suggest you try a preamp that is resistant to overload since the attenuation from the trees and the attic might be more than we thought.

For preamps consider the Channel Master 7778, the Antennas Direct Juice with an FM filter added, or the RCA TVPRAMP1R. The CM and the RCA have internal FM filters. The AD Juice does not have an internal FM filter, but it does have a 4G-LTE filter to reject cell phone transmissions. The RCA is inexpensive, but has a history of quality control problems.

Attic antennas are not required to be grounded, but it would be a good idea to ground the coax shield with a grounding block to reject interference from strong local FM signals.
http://www.fmfool.com/modeling/tmp/6...e/Radar-FM.png

Once I get the attenuator I will report back. This is about to get over my head. Lol. I though I could just get rid of cable TV and install a antenna.We'll see what happens. Thanks

Yes, it can get complicated, especially with an attic antenna and trees. It is going to take a few tests, and the results of those tests will determine what to try next. You are doing fine and we will try to help you as best we can in this "remote control" way.

If you are willing to give me your address in a Private Message, I can see what the trees look like in an aerial view and add the green signal lines. It would look something like this:

Vertical view:

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1479761082

Bird's eye view:

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1479761082


You can do your own using the tvfool interactive map browser by moving the cursor (drag and drop) to your antenna location.
http://www.tvfool.com/index.php?opti...pper&Itemid=90

Do you get WVEC 13 ABC OK?

If you get 49.1-49.4 just fine (or as fine as you can for standard def programming), there's absolutely nothing wrong with your antenna. Leave it alone, otherwise you may break something that isn't yet broken.

ADTech's comment reminded me of a problem that I had with a converter box and ION, and so did others. It seemed to be a problem with the network feed, because after a while it cleared up. It is hard for me to believe that the Apex boxes healed themselves.
http://www.highdefforum.com/local-hd...onalities.html

ION must have had reports of the problem because they suggested a double rescan:

http://www.iontelevision.com/rescan

What equipment are you using for reception?

Do you have more than one TV to try with the antenna?

EXCELLENT information as usual rabbit

Nice work!

Thank you; I keep trying.

Sometimes I get a hit and sometimes I strike out.:)

Well the attenuator came in today and I installed it . Did not see any improvement at all. I turned it all the way up and put it on channels 49.5 and 49.6 and they were the same. Started backing the knob down a litltle at a time and saw no change. Should I try the preamp now ? I can move the antenna outside if it will make it much better. I have a 20' pole on the side of my house where I had a antenna many years ago. If I move the antenna outside it may take a while as at the monment I have one hand.(have a bad tendon in left hand). I'll have to get my son-in-law over one day to help. Let me Know my next step. Thank you

Thanks for making the test and giving us the report.
If you were using the AD ATT-1 attenuator, you should have seen channels getting worse as you turned it down. It can turn down about 3-3/4 turns.

You didn't answer this question:
What equipment are you using for reception? How many TVs do you have?

Have you tried another TV with the antenna?

Have you tried a double rescan to clear the tuner memory?
https://www.google.com/#q=FCC+double+rescan

When all of those are checked, then it is time to try a preamp.

Antenna was put up after new roof.New roof around March, Antenna November.
Using the AD ATT-1 attenuator. Will go back up in attic and try again.
Antenna using is Channel Master CM-4221HD
TV- Sony XBR-65X850D. TV is new bought mid November. Don't know if old TV worked or not. Still had cable TV for about a week after new TV.
Have not tried another TV but will do so today.Will also do the double rescan today.
Thanks again for your help.
Also did you get my Private Message with my address not sure if I did that right.

Also if outside antenna is prefered than which model antenna is best?
Also have a Channel Master DVR+ coming.Wife wants to record a couple of shows on PBS.
Thanks again
Only hooked up to one TV

Did the double rescan and stayed the same.
Tried another Tv- 32" Panasonic and that also was the same.
Also did the double rescan on the 32" TV
Thanks again

Thank you for doing some more tests to eliminate some possibilities.
I want to be sure that I understand the results of your tests. You seem to say that the Sony AND the Panasonic both can get 49.1 but not QVC (49.5) and HSN (49.6).
Does that mean there is no signal at all for 49.5 and 49.6 or does that mean there is a signal, but it is poor? Poor video quality or poor signal strength with pixilation and picture freeze?

If you mean that there is a signal for 49.5 and 49.6, but it doesn't look as good, then it could be because of the difference in video signal quality that is transmitted. 49.1 is transmitted in 720p video, but 49.5 and 49.6 are transmitted in 480i which is not as sharp, especially on a 65" screen.
http://www.rabbitears.info/market.ph...&callsign=wpxv

CBS broadcasts the best video quality, 1080i
http://www.rabbitears.info/market.ph...&callsign=wtkr

There is a signal on 49.5 and 49.6 but it's poor video quality with pixilation. The picture does not freeze?

Sorry, it did not show up in my PM inbox. Please try again. Click on my username at the left side of my post. In the drop down menu click on Send a private message to rabbit 73. This will bring up a form with my username already listed as Recipient. Enter your message and click on Submit Message. To check if it was sent, go to your Sent Items folder.

If it has pixilation, that probably means weak signal, which is a surprise considering how strong the signals are on your report. That would mean there is something wrong with your antenna system, or there is something blocking the signals on the way to your antenna.

Your Sony has a Diagnostics screen for the signals. Can you record what the readings are for your channels?
https://us.en.kb.sony.com/app/answer...831/c/65%2C66/

https://us.en.kb.sony.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/48446

https://docs.sony.com/release/hyperl..._ver_1.0.7.pdf p17

https://docs.sony.com/release/hyperl..._ver_1.0.7.PDF p2 Digital Broadcast

Digital Broadcast
channels do not
look good

Weak signal, Or Antenna
not positioned for best
reception.

Use the remote control to select the Digital Broadcast
channel with poor reception, then press the Home
button and select Help‐>Signal Diagnostics, several
parameters regarding the broadcast signal are shown. If
the Signal‐to‐Noise ratio is outside the range of between
19 & 35 dB, the broadcast signal is too weak, or the
antenna may need to be repositioned for best reception.
If the signal is too weak and adjusting the antenna does
not improve the reception, a more sensitive antenna, or
an external RF amplifier may help.

Do you get WVEC 13 ABC OK?

Channel 13.1 comes in very good. Went back to 49.5 and 49.6 and the picture is " fuzzy". Not Pixilating. You can make out the pictures but after looking at it a few minutes I think I'd get a headache. Lol.
( more like a double picture), will try PM again
Thanks

signal diagnostic test:
Physical channel-46
Freg (KHZ) - 665000
Modulation - 8VSB
Status - lock
Errors - 0
SNR ( db) 294/311
Ran the test twice on channels 49.5/49.6. That's why two numbers on SNR (db)

Would a better antenna work ? what would be a more sensitive antenna ? I'll move it out side if that will work.

The tvfool site has been down since Sunday, so I haven't had a chance to answer. I was about ready to call you, but I can answer now.Thanks for the signal readings; very helpful. I don't think a better antenna will help, although you are welcome to experiment. The signal readings indicate a good signal with SNR from 29.4 to 31.1 dB.

I think what you have is the Big Screen Problem. Not too many years ago, we thought a 21 inch TV had a big screen, then it was 32 inch, then it was 40 inch, and now it is 65 inch. When the picture gets larger, the imperfections also get larger to the point that we can't ignore them.

To make matters worse, when a channel adds a lot of sub channels, they have to reduce the resolution from 1080i to 720p, and then to 480i in order to fit them all in one 6 MHz wide channel.

And then to make the picture quality even worse they compress the signal to squeeze yet another sub channel in. This is what ION has done.

I connected an antenna to my 32 inch Sony TV to receive ION at this location. I asked my wife to look at 49.5 and 49.6. She said that the picture definition was not acceptable; a woman wants to see the detail in the jewelry and clothing.

I then connected the TV to Cox cable to show my wife what 1080i HD looked like for QVC and HSN. She said that's the way it should be.

The difference between compressed 480i and 1080i HD is about the same as the difference between an old VHS tape and a DVD movie in HD. Once we see how good it can be, we are never happy with lesser quality.

OTA

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1480452466

Cox cable

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1480455763

HSN comparison

OTA

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1480453850

Cox cable

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1480456105

CBS Sports OTA

http://forum.tvfool.com/attachment.p...1&d=1480455081

I can see what you are saying about a 65" TV and a 32" TV. The 65" is very " fuzzy" and the 32" is not very bad at all on 49.5 and 49.6. All channels are good except 49.5 and 49.6 so we will live with it, It's good that my wife said she doesn't really need those channels. I said good it will save me money. Lol. Thank you very much for the time you have put into helping me.

You are welcome. I'm glad that I helped you understand how important it is to have an HD signal with a big screen TV.

You can also see the difference compression can make if you compare 480i QVC and HSN on ION OTA with the better 480i on PBS Create OTA.

I included the left side of the TV frame (except CBS; image too wide) to show that all images were about the same magnification; 40mm on my 15 inch laptop computer at 100%.