View Single Post
Old 25-Nov-2020, 7:07 PM   #79
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripelo View Post
That would be good if was practical. For accuracy, the two antennas would need to be located at the same physical place. In many cases at UHF, a separation of a foot or so, and the two antenna combos can receive different signals.
That is true because the wavefront is non-uniform. I have seen a difference in the scan of a channel when moving the antenna a foot horizontally.



But then, how is it possible for you to make a valid comparison of the performance of the two systems? Have the two antennas on a sliding carriage that moves each antenna into the same location, or what? Otherwise, how can you possibly get a comparison like you would on a lab grade antenna range? On a range, you would use a constant strength test signal and place each antenna, in turn, in the same location.

The closest I got to the ideal was to switch the two antenna locations, but I really wanted to be able to slide them sideways.



The white wall was just a background for the photo. The actual comparison was done at a location with OTA signals that were as constant as I could find. I used an A/B switch for a rapid comparison.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg CH42setup2.jpg (224.1 KB, 113 views)
File Type: jpg QEXimg1_1.jpg (168.2 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg Antenna Test Site5_2.jpg (78.0 KB, 113 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 25-Nov-2020 at 8:16 PM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote