Quote:
Originally Posted by tomfoolery
Out of curiosity, and because it's an interesting problem, I ran the report based on the Lat/Lon in your report, but at 43 ft (10 ft higher), and the NM for WHO actually went further negative. Presumably it has something to do with it being listed as 'tropo'.
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...46ae9d09e39580
I don't have an answer, of course - I'm just following along as it's an interesting discussion. |
Hmm, I see that.
When I run the interactive tv coverage tool at 43 ft., it shows WHO as being a 2edge signal with a NM of -7.1.
Actually the radar plot shows a NM of -6.9, here is the signal analysis:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...46ae952a762207