View Single Post
Old 2-May-2019, 10:35 PM   #13
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeAZ View Post
Just an aside. Both the TV Fool and the rabbitears have significant errors and/or omissions. Of the two, rabbitears is more accurate.
Yes, rabbitears.info is more accurate. But, it should be because it is run by Trip who works for the FCC. It's about as accurate as it can be with all the Repack changes.
Quote:
I have NEVER seen KDFQ in any of my travels.
KDFQ was analog on 47. It is now licensed for digital on 27, but is silent.
https://www.rabbitears.info/market.p...&callsign=KDFQ

https://www.rabbitears.info/tvq.php?...ems&facid=7369

http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProEngine....6308c9d99a17aa
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote