View Single Post
Old 25-Jun-2017, 12:53 AM   #4
rabbit73
Retired A/V Tech
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 2,747
When I was making the measurements of the New CM balun, I noticed the loss readings would vary according to the position of the 300 ohm wires between them. I decided to cut the wires to 2-1/2" before removing the insulation to see of it would make any difference.



I then made measurements of this modified balun:

Code:
Channel Master New 94444 Balun with 2-1/2" Wires

Ch        F-81  Bal  Dif  Ea
          ---dBmV--  --dB---

15        7.3   4.8  2.5  1.3

28        6.4   4.7  1.7  0.9

45        5.6   3.8  1.8  0.9
The loss was reduced and was much less affected by the position of the wires. The long wires formed a transmission line of indefinite impedance.

If you use the new CM balun, I suggest you keep the wires short.

If you need a low loss balun for weak signal reception, I suggest a halfwave coaxial balun.

The PCB baluns in the new UHF antennas have low loss, but they are good for only one band. If you need a balun for UHF and VHF, use a conventional ferrite core balun like one of the above.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3Baluns2.jpg (195.4 KB, 4800 views)
__________________
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
http://www.megalithia.com/elect/aeri...ttpoorman.html

Last edited by rabbit73; 25-Jun-2017 at 1:42 AM.
rabbit73 is offline   Reply With Quote