View Single Post
Old 10-Jul-2012, 7:34 PM   #4
GroundUrMast
Moderator
 
GroundUrMast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Posts: 4,773
I believe the signal from KCWX (CW network), real channel 5 is receivable. When I run the numbers though, the CS600 with no amplifier, UVSJ, cables and splitter starts to look like it barely gets the job done.

25.6 dB (NM in the air) - 14 dB (Low-VHF Noise Correction Factor) + 2.3 dBd (Antenna Gain) - 7 dB (Cable, Splitter & UVSJ Loss) - (6 dB Tuner NF) = Net NM of 0.9 dB.

A Net NM under 10 dB is begging for drop outs and loss of signal.

You'll get more reliable results if you opt for a larger Low-VHF antenna such as the Winegard YA-6260. On paper, adding a low noise preamp such as the Antennas Direct CPA-19 improves the situation as well. IMO, using the YA-6260 and CPA-19 would be prudent. Using both 'upgrades' pushes the Net NM up over 15 dB.
__________________
If the well is dry and you don't see rain on the horizon, you'll need to dig the hole deeper. (If the antenna can't get the job done, an amp won't fix it.)

(Please direct account activation inquiries to 'admin')
GroundUrMast is offline   Reply With Quote